Cloud rendering is essentially similar to cloud computing; however, it’s based on a render farm that allows users to upload files to a server via their rendering client. This process uses several computer hardware in a cluster network that shows an intricate three-dimensional view. Calculations are used to generate either a preview or the final animation to see possible adjustments on visual effects. Making use of better equipment while lowering costs makes cloud rendering a better option than the traditional approach.
If a producer made an interior rendering, it’s often based on dimensions of 3600 x 2500 pixels. It would take a typical computer three to six hours to render the file. However, cloud rendering reduces the time to about one hour. Without question, it is way faster than a render farm while it does not consume much storage. You need not guard the entire rendering process as well, unlike the traditional process that you may not finish because it’s cumbersome.
This innovative form of rendering can also adjust automatically when more computing resources are needed. Therefore, you will not be constricted by hardware limitations to get the job done. While waiting for the project to finish, you can do other tasks as well. Its fault tolerance rate is high to keep the process running smoothly. While cloud rendering does have its obvious advantages, it still has its fair share of critics who point out loopholes in the system. In this article, we will be constructively breaking down criticism surrounding cloud rendering.
What naysayers point out against cloud rendering
Their first criticism stems from the fact that cloud services make consumers look like renters more than owners. Even if they have the capability to stream faster, they regulate the loading of data so that consumers will constantly depend on them for access. This scenario plays out to most on streaming services like Netflix and cloud gaming, requiring higher computing power. Corporations would want nothing but to control those devices.
No wonder some companies love their End User License Agreement because it allows them to skip from one product to another, especially when the software or the game is offered as a service and not a product. When they sell it to consumers, they must transfer the rights to the buyer. But if they offer cloud rendering as a service, they can dictate how users can use what they own for a certain subscription fee.
Additionally, data transfer reliability is also an issue because stalled or limited connections may add more time to the process. Worse, it may restart if the transfer was interrupted midway. Countries with slower Internet speeds will feel the discrepancy in data transfer, which the data center cannot solve. Of course, any household with multiple users would have to improve their Internet bandwidth to reduce lag.
They also point out latency issues due to data transfer limits from server to client. While there have been advancements to address this concern, some consoles still lag in rendering data from the cloud. On the other hand, critics also point out the massive amount of energy to keep data centers cool to continue to compute smoothly. This issue translates into more cooling systems needed to regulate the temperature of the user’s gaming CPU. In turn, using more energy can be detrimental to the environment.
That said, is there hope for cloud rendering and cloud gaming to become more energy efficient? Yes, indeed, because some data centers are running on renewable energy already. Some big tech companies like Google and Microsoft even pledge that they will be carbon negative by 2030. But while they are setting timelines for the transition to green energy; however, no one is verifying if they are fulfilling their promise. Coming to our main topic, is cloud rendering the biggest culprit in environmental destruction?
Interestingly, other industries like fashion and oil contribute more harm to the planet. However, to satisfy the critics, companies must assess the impact of their services even without government regulation. Once they report their findings to the public, they must develop a plan to reduce emissions based on science-based targets.
Fixing cloud rendering will give everyone a fair chance.
Maintaining flawless cloud services will usher in a seamless transfer of information. Given that data is a highly valuable commodity nowadays, it’s important that everyone receives the information on time and understands the message. However, delivering high-quality digital content can cause bottlenecks that will ultimately hinder revenue. Unfortunately, not everyone can afford sophisticated computers and software that can speed up the process.
That’s why those who depend on digital output turn to cloud rendering to let them stay in the game. But novices might fall into the trap of people looking to dismantle systems all for a quick dollar. The non-fungible token community is one of these high-risk groups because the platform is relatively new. Therefore, those looking to be a part of it must assess cloud rendering companies down to the smallest detail.
Otherwise, that company might be either a scam or a predatory provider that slaps you with surprise invoices. There’s also the danger of malware and viruses, given that it involves computers. But if it’s done correctly, cloud rendering can boost more creators’ confidence to develop their craft and share it with the world. From simple NFTs like images and in-game fashion, they will drive to develop 3D rendering of famous scenarios or places and offer it as tokens.
If all goes well, these creative entrepreneurs will feel empowered to do more masterpieces because their audience can give immediate feedback about their work. Given that the budget for a start-up creative is limited, they turn to cloud rendering to store their artwork online. But just like in the movie “Field of Dreams,” they will come if you build it.
That’s why the pioneers in the industry are already raking in the money. Without hesitation, they jumped into NFT creation to express their creativity in a new and exciting platform. However, they also started with a meager budget and a dream. Cloud services through NFT marketplaces helped them showcase their skill and build a following.
But if cloud rendering won’t fix its loopholes along the way, creators will hesitate to take the plunge. Worse, the masterpieces they devoted countless hours of their time and effort into might be lost forever if a virus or a hacker skims through the cracks of Internet security.
If cloud rendering remains secure, these creative entrepreneurs can focus on producing nothing but the best. Once they receive the monetary fruits of their labor, they get to hire people who can expand their operations. With more people involved, they can develop more creative and innovative uses of NFTs that the public will enjoy. We believe the feeling of freedom and empowerment will help boost the general economy and help spread the benefits to more people.
If you know someone who aspires to make it big in NFTs, introduce them to services that will fulfill their ambition. Whether they are sharing their artwork or are creating digital fashion for online influencers or esports titles, all of them need a reliable cloud rendering service that can shorten production time and devote more hours to promoting their creations.